People criticizes a lot about Picasso’s art; cubics. I too don’t critcize his work of art but I am confused about why his cubic arts are known as modern art. I would see, myself as a regular person that modern art would be something like animated or is like a picture colored in all real colors and shows modern-day stuffs. The arts of Picasso’s cubicismvshow an abstract picture of an image that a person can probably see but it is distorted. For example we did a drawing picture of a person sitting in a chair. You can see that it is a picture of the person sitting down in the chair but image is distorted by cubicism thus making it look abstract. So when people look at Picasso’s drawing of image that has been converted into cubicism, they would not think that it is modern day art, because it is either new to them or they just don’t accept it as a new/modern art. Yes it is a new art but differentiating if it should be resembles as modern art or not, I’d say that people will probably not agree that it is modern art at all. Another reason not to believe that cubic is not a modern day art is because we’ve seen too many new art such as HD, or better lighting in the theaters, and animated art and therefore we infer those to be new art, because they are brighter, have better colors, and are only shown in our time(20th Century). So in the end I too will agree that cubic is not a modern day art, because there isn’t any high-tech quality of cubic art beside its new way of showing an image but more abstract that’s all.
Being Artistic
Advertisement
